Cheng Li-wun did NOT redefine 1992 Consensus. She stood up for it.

Treść źródłowa

Interpretations of politically sensitive cross-Strait meetings will always differ. That is normal. But there is a basic standard analysis should still meet: it should remain anchored in what was actually said, whether in public video, in contemporaneous transcripts, or in official text that has not been disputed. On KMT Chair Cheng Li-wun’s recent visit to the Chinese mainland, some commentary has moved beyond interpretation into claims that the available record does not support. Brian Hioe, a commentator, recently titled his analysis in his co-founded New Bloom on Cheng Li-wun’s visit to the Chinese mainland as Cheng Li-Wun Redefines 1992 Consensus, Calls for United Front Against Independence in Xi Meeting, where Hioe argued (all emphasis below are ours)Before Cheng’s meeting with Xi, Cheng had already made a major policy address in Nanjing, at Sun Yat-Sen’s Mausoleum. Notably, Cheng advocated commitment to the 1992 Consensus, but this was framed as “One Country, Oppose Taiwanese independence” rather than “One China, respective interpretations.”Cheng’s shift in her framing of the 1992 Consensus was rapidly noted by analysts in Taiwan. During the comments by Xi Jinping that did, in fact, occur in full view of the media, Xi echoed this framing.…To this end, Cheng called for the establishment of an institutionalized mechanism for cross-strait exchanges, on the basis of the 1992 Consensus and One China Principle…As such, it is possible that, with Xi echoing her language on the 1992 Consensus being “One China, Oppose Taiwan Independence,” Cheng has accomplished what previous KM…